This website is run by volunteers. It was originally set up to support people through what was then believed to be a very short "emergency lockdown", but the experts got it wrong, the tsunami never appeared.

Covid is a killer, but so is normal seasonal flu and so are heart attacks, cancer and a host of other things that are far far more important than covid and which we can do something about. If you care about people's health, their rights, their future, your job, public services, that government policy should be based on evidence and not hysteria, please come along to one of the protest meetings and get your voice heard. Please research the subject, write to your representatives, write to papers, post your views on social media and tell your friends.

If anyone had been listening to the UK government or media, rather than looking at the data, they could be forgiven for thinking that 2020 was a totally exception year.

But as the age adjusted death rate for each year in England and Wales shows, that was an outright lie:

The reality is that 2020 was well below years in the 2000s and that if we average 2019, which was particularly low,  and 2020, we find that the death rate was almost the same as years in the 2010s. There was no abnormal number of deaths.

And the situation is even better in Sweden which didn't have a lockup: Lockdown Sceptics

Above is a graph from the React-2 study of anti-bodies showing that each of the three peaks of the epidemic, that the lockups occurred after the epidemic had peaked and started to decline. As such the lockup did not cause the peak, nor did it reduce the size of the peak, nor did it cause the epidemic to deline. If they had any effect, it was at best marginal at the end of the epidemic after it had been naturally controlled without (illegal) government lockups.

For a full discussion by Professor Tim Spector, principal investigator at ZOE; Professor Simon Wood, from the University of Edinburgh see:

Things were not going well for the UK genetic therapy program but they have suddenly gone from a "flop" to a "scandal".

The flop

Put simply, because they gave the genetic therapy to those most at risk of dying, then the death rate should have come down relative to positive cases (with a delay). It hasn't showing the therapy is having no discernible effect.

To explain it in more detail: They gave the therapy to those most at risk of dying. So, we can divide society into two groups:

A: Those most at risk of dying
B: Those least at risk of dying 

Overwhelmingly those who die are in group A. Those who test positive are in both group A and B, however, since group A is much smaller than group B, the people who test positive will be predominantly from group B.

So, the simplest test is to compare the number of positive tests, with the number of deaths and to see whether the ratio remains constant. If the ratio remains constant, then the graph of deaths and the graph of positive cases should be the same (with a delay for deaths). At the moment we are seeing a reduction in both, so we have various scenarios:

1. The rate of decline of deaths is much greater than tests => the therapy worked
2. The rate of decline in deaths is about the same as the test => the therapy has no significant effect
3. The death rate doesn't decline anywhere near as fast as the tests => the therapy is causing deaths.

What we see (graph right source worldometer) is that the graph of deaths (red) and that of positives (blue) are very similar in the second peak. This indicate the therapy had no discernible effect. However, what we also see is that the ratio of deaths to positives has increased from the first to the second peak, after the therapy started to be given. Let's restate that: after the vaccine started to be doled out, deaths were higher than before. Unfortunately, there are a few issues: the delay between positives and deaths, that this delay isn't fixed with tends to smooth out the peak, and that not all the deaths are reported in the last week and a bit. This might leave wriggle room for the vaccine companies. However, we can check this conclusion. We assume that the therapy went first to the very elderly. Then we expect any therapy effect to first have an effect on the most elderly. So if we compare the death rate amongst the very elderly with younger groups if the rate is falling much faster than other groups, then the therapy is working. If about the same, then not. This time we are comparing like with like and do not need to include a time delay. Here is a graph showing total excess deaths which we are told are due to covid (source)

Again, the shape of the curves since 20 December are very similar. We certainly are not seeing a rapid decline of the over 85s taking them below any other age group. Indeed, the numbers are becoming so small that it will soon be impossible to make out any further change. That means for all realistic purposes, this peak in deaths ended naturally and not because of any therapy. So it was a flop!

The Scandal

“This is a new Holocaust” – Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann

But not only is the therapy a flop, but it may well become a scandal if research in Israel that people are far more likely to die from the therapy than covid turns out to be true.

It's very difficult to validate this research, because like the UK, their government is trying to hide the genetic therapy deaths. But this is the key claims:

  • In January 2021, there were 3,000 records of vaccine adverse events, including 2,900 for mRNA vaccines.
  • Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.
  • On February 11, a Ynet article presented data related to vaccination. The authors of the Nakim article claim to have debunked this analysis based on data published by Ynet itself: “We took the data by looking at mortality during the vaccination period, which spans 5 weeks. By analyzing these data, we arrived at startling figures that attribute significant mortality to the vaccine.”
  • The authors say “vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have caused during the same period.”
  • Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann declare that for them, “this is a new Holocaust,” in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens.


Explaining the anomaly

The UK have made sure that as many people as possible have heard the false narrative that the "vaccine is working" by claiming that the "vaccine" has been shown to produce anti-bodies. But as we see above, it isn't reducing deaths. However, could the Israeli research explain this anomaly? If people were getting an immune response from the genetic therapy, then that could reduce deaths, but if the therapy is also causing deaths, of which only a small fraction were counted as "covid deaths" due to false positives, is it possible that the coincidence of covid positive and dying from the therapy and the reduction in covid from the therapy appear to cancel each other out? 

The crime

Under international law, it is an extremely serious crime to force people to undergo experimental medical procedures, whether that is a mass quarantine which was a very experimental medical procedure, or the still experimental genetic therapies they falsely call "vaccines". I haven't checked but the punishment may include the death penality, which given that the research from Israel is beginning to suggest the therapy is a death sentence for some, may be quite appropriate.

Now that 2020 is over, I thought I would plot the bi-annual number of deaths per 100,000 population.

As you will no doubt notice, 2019-2020 not only doesn't show an alarming number of deaths, it is in fact the lowest (equal) number of deaths out of all the years in the last two decades. Isn't that GREAT - we should be celebrating that life expectancy went up over the last two years as we had a record breaking low number of deaths.

Under the Human Rights act there is a right to liberty:

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases..

whilst there is an exemption for infectious diseases that seems applicable to covid:

(e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases,

the European Court Guidance on this exemption makes it clear that governments are only allowed to detain "infected persons" and moreover, any law that contravenes this provision, must be interpreted as if it were compatible. Thus in effect, any laws or rules that remove the right to liberty of people, can be read as (possibly) removing the right to liberty of Infected persons and them alone.